|
|
|
Private Military/Security Companies
Private Military Companies or Private Security Companies are a reality in 21st century conflicts all around the globe. Often mistaken with their ancient predecessors (the so-called mercenaries), offer their protection/defensive services to both private and public clients, including NGOs, United Nations, aid agencies and goverments.
This site is a portal which offers news and articles on this topic. A controversial topic which gains more and more public attention due to their status as civilians and increasing casualties among this group of operators .
Together with the whole private security community we are crediting their sacrifice. Be it to their country, their client or asset to be protected or their buddies working at their side.
|
|
|
KBR Connected to Alleged Fraud, Pentagon Auditor Says |
|
By Ellen Nakashima Washington Post Staff Writer - May 5, 2009
KBR, the Army's largest contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan, is linked to "the vast majority" of suspected combat-zone fraud cases that have been referred to investigators, as well as a majority of the $13 billion in "questioned" or "unsupported" costs, the Pentagon's top auditor said yesterday.
In testimony before the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, April G. Stephenson, director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency, said investigators have sent to the inspector general a total of 32 cases of suspected overbilling, bribery and other violations since 2004.
"I don't think we're aware of a program, contract or contractor that
has had this number of suspensions or referrals," Stephenson said.
KBR's work accounts for 43 percent of the Pentagon's audited Iraq
contracting dollars, according to the agency's data.
Stephenson's disclosures come as the Pentagon prepares to draw down
forces in Iraq, requiring major support from contractors, while ramping
up reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan. Lawmakers are pushing the
government to introduce more competition in its procurement programs.
Asked for comment, KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne said in an e-mail
that KBR, then a subsidiary of Halliburton, was awarded the opportunity
in 2001 to perform the Army's war-zone logistics work "following a
competitive bidding process." The value of that work is now more than
$31 billion. She said the firm "in no way condones or tolerates illegal
or unethical behavior."
President Obama has made contract reform a top priority. Shortly after
taking office, he vowed to end no-bid contracts that he said "have
wasted billions" of dollars in Iraq.
The hearing focused on contracts for logistics in war zones, which
involves housing and feeding troops, washing their clothes, providing
their recreation. Costs soared to $5.7 billion in 2008 from $55 million
in 2001.
While KBR won the 2001 logistics contract in a competitive process, all
task orders for that work, some worth billions of dollars apiece, were
not competitively bid. Some commission members yesterday said they
believed that contributed to overbilling and waste. They wanted to know
why the Army had not moved faster to award logistics orders
competitively two years after creating a program to do so.
"Is part of the problem that, in essence with this one contractor,
we've basically said, 'KBR is too big to fail?' " asked commissioner
Christopher Shays, a former GOP congressman from Connecticut. "Or too
important -- so we are almost treating it like we treat DOD? It's too
big to fail, so we still fund them?"
Stephenson also revealed that some $553 million in payments have been
suspended or blocked because contract officials questioned them or said
they were invalid. The payments were run up by KBR in Iraq, said
commissioner Charles Tiefer, a contract law professor at the University
of Baltimore.
The commissioners cited a May 1 letter to Defense Secretary Robert M.
Gates from Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine),
calling on the Pentagon to do more to recover more than $100 million in
overcharges and excessive profits associate with KBR employees
suspected of fraud.
A large portion of the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, called
Logcap, consists of subcontracting. Last week, Stephenson's agency
issued a report that found the internal controls of KBR's purchasing
system to be inadequate.
Defense Contract Management Agency Director Charlie E. Williams Jr.
said that finding will be taken into account as the Pentagon makes
awards under its new logistics contract program, called Logcap 4. To
ensure the government gets the best price for the service, the Pentagon
chose three contractors who may compete for Logcap 4 business. They are
DynCorp International, Fluor and KBR.
"In terms of lessons learned, how did KBR become one of the contractors on Logcap 4?" commission member Linda J. Gustitus asked.
Jeffrey Parsons, executive director of U.S. Army Contracting Command,
said he was involved in the source selection and was not aware of any
inadequate KBR systems.
|
|
|